That's why I'm bad photographer - I always edit pictures as I like them, but not how standards ask me to do it :) So that's the result and it's always pleasure to know other opinions, so thanks everyone! :)
You will NEVER see image like this with your own eyes (unless you are using/smoking something :)). So in my opinion it is NOT real, not that I don't understand it - tipical HDR. When I started taking pictures, I experimented with it. Didn't like it.
Jorsh, just because you didn't like HDR, don't say it's bullshit. Everybody SHOULD edit their pictures in photoshop as long as they have the necessary skills. Our eye is much more "clever" than that piece of metal/plastics/glass for few hundreds of lats in our hands. Our eye gets picture better and with editing we can catch that level up. Of cousre we've seen many beginners with bad quality sources, later oversaturating them and doing other unnecessary things in PS to get them even worse… , but this time this isn't the case!
Secondly - it was that way in a photography world from the very beginning - untill the aviofoto.lv came in apparently - people making photos in film-process were retouching them using different darkroom manipulations like double-exposure, differential exposure etc, because there is no simply "shop or don't shop" - it's only either GOOD or BAD.
If you are such an expert and can take such a great photos straight away - go for it! So look at Viper's pictures and then Yours and think again, what drives your comments like these. I could add that long exposure photo is also "not real" and you "will never see image like this with your own eyes unless you are smoking", so please remove it from your blog.. ah ok, you are the boss, sorry forget it :)
Jorsh:
"You will NEVER see image like this with your own eyes..."
Art, probably, exists for creating things impossible to be seen with your own eyes..:)
There must be a Dream. And not necessary after smoking something... :)
arizah - please, quote the exact text, where I said something about bullshit or something like that! I'm waiting. All I said, that it's OVERshopped, not that I don't use photoshop. It absolutely necessary most of the time. And about overshopping - this (picture) is exactly the case.
BTSKY - none of the pictures above are mine, but that's not the point. I was only talking about extreme overshopping and then calling it "the art". That's it. Plain and simple.
Jorsh, tavs komentārs 2013-12-14 23:07:55
tikai tāpēc, ka tev nesanāca HDR, jo biji iesācējs, nenozīmē, ka vajag pamācīt cilvēkus, kuriem tas sanāk labāk par tevi! Nekas te nav overshopots, tā bilde nevienā vietā neclipo, nevajag piesieties tur, kur nav par ko piesieties, jo no malas tas izskatās tikai pēc viena - baltas skaudības. Cilvēks bija centies un uztaisījis kvalitatīvu bildi, labāku par visām tavējām kopā, no vietas, kur mums vairums šejieniešu pat go-pro kameru nekad dzīvē nepielipinās un padalījies ar to tavā necilajā portālā! Novērtē to! Ko tu gribi panākt? portālu pilnu ar šitādu te drazu? aviofoto.lv/?c=bilde&id=16193&a…
Kurš kaut ko teica, ka man kaut kas ar HDR nesanāca? Viss sanāca un pat labāk, nekā plānoju (bija bildes sensenons laikos iekš shutter.lv, erfoto.lv). Vienkārši tā lieta, kā tāda - nedabīga. Skaudība? Drīzāk neizpratne, ka brāķis "aiziet" tik labi. Ja joprojām neuzskati šo par brāķi - paskaties uz to balto pāreju starp debesīm un lidmašīnu. Un vispār, ar ko es te mēģinu strīdēties - ja pats būtu fočuku kādreiz rokās paņēmis un ar HDR spēlējies - saprastu, par ko ir runa. A tagad diskutēt ar nulle bilžu autoru par to, kura ir laba un kura nav laba bilde... teikšu tā - parādi uz ko pats esi spējīgs un tad parunāsim. Turies un neapvainojies! :)
Jā, cenšos. Vienalga vienīgais, ko no visu tekstiem sapratu - "šī ir māksla" un tjipa jāaizveras. Neviens arī necentās izlasīt un saprast, ko es te mēģinu teikt. Ieskaitot arī Tevi. Pēdējo reizi novirzīšu visu acis uz to balto malu starp debesīm un lidmašīnu. Joprojām nepielec? Joprojām šķiet, ka tā tam jābūt? Šeit ir labs piemērs, kur viss ir izdarīts pareizi un šai bilde var pateikt, ka ir šopota, bet nav pāršopota: aviofoto.lv/?c=bilde&id=5719
Viss, ievelkam visi tagad dziļu elpu, iedzeram karstvīnu un uztraucamies par kādām globālākām lietām... :) Jauku visiem 3. adventi! :)
Tu, laikam, esi pavisam jocīgs palicis... Ja nepielec, tad neko. Cik reizes var skaidrot? Man, personīgi, jau apnika šī diskusija. Turpini vārīties pats ar sevi. Paņem vēl ekspertu arizah bariņā.
kinda overshopped... didn't know, that our users have taste for that...
This one tastes to be a nice art :)
if "the art" is overshopped, then ok. I would have given my "like" for more or less original colours...
but anyway - congrats on photo of the week... :)
That's why I'm bad photographer - I always edit pictures as I like them, but not how standards ask me to do it :) So that's the result and it's always pleasure to know other opinions, so thanks everyone! :)
I would say that we need also such a kind so keep doing the art. Just next time put art to art map (Avio māksla).
Jorsh - then we can say for paintings that they are overpainted as well, just because we do not understand them :)
You will NEVER see image like this with your own eyes (unless you are using/smoking something :)). So in my opinion it is NOT real, not that I don't understand it - tipical HDR. When I started taking pictures, I experimented with it. Didn't like it.
And the worst thing in this picture - the white border between the sky and the airplane.
"unless you are using/smoking something" I almost fell off my chair :D :D :D :D :D
Jorsh, just because you didn't like HDR, don't say it's bullshit. Everybody SHOULD edit their pictures in photoshop as long as they have the necessary skills. Our eye is much more "clever" than that piece of metal/plastics/glass for few hundreds of lats in our hands. Our eye gets picture better and with editing we can catch that level up. Of cousre we've seen many beginners with bad quality sources, later oversaturating them and doing other unnecessary things in PS to get them even worse… , but this time this isn't the case! Secondly - it was that way in a photography world from the very beginning - untill the aviofoto.lv came in apparently - people making photos in film-process were retouching them using different darkroom manipulations like double-exposure, differential exposure etc, because there is no simply "shop or don't shop" - it's only either GOOD or BAD. If you are such an expert and can take such a great photos straight away - go for it! So look at Viper's pictures and then Yours and think again, what drives your comments like these. I could add that long exposure photo is also "not real" and you "will never see image like this with your own eyes unless you are smoking", so please remove it from your blog.. ah ok, you are the boss, sorry forget it :)
Well, you will never seen image with your own eyes like this: aviofoto.lv/?c=bilde&id=2577&ma… and aviofoto.lv/?c=bilde&id=2438&ma… and aviofoto.lv/?c=bilde&id=3317&ma… and aviofoto.lv/?c=bilde&id=6916&ma… Ups, one of those is your own image :) None of those images are real, but is existing due to picturing techniques and processing techniques used. Photographing is an art, art has so many ways of expression that it is not worth to discuss this if you are not interested in this at all.
Jorsh: "You will NEVER see image like this with your own eyes..." Art, probably, exists for creating things impossible to be seen with your own eyes..:) There must be a Dream. And not necessary after smoking something... :)
arizah - please, quote the exact text, where I said something about bullshit or something like that! I'm waiting. All I said, that it's OVERshopped, not that I don't use photoshop. It absolutely necessary most of the time. And about overshopping - this (picture) is exactly the case. BTSKY - none of the pictures above are mine, but that's not the point. I was only talking about extreme overshopping and then calling it "the art". That's it. Plain and simple.
Sorry technical malfunction, now there is.
Jorsh, tavs komentārs 2013-12-14 23:07:55 tikai tāpēc, ka tev nesanāca HDR, jo biji iesācējs, nenozīmē, ka vajag pamācīt cilvēkus, kuriem tas sanāk labāk par tevi! Nekas te nav overshopots, tā bilde nevienā vietā neclipo, nevajag piesieties tur, kur nav par ko piesieties, jo no malas tas izskatās tikai pēc viena - baltas skaudības. Cilvēks bija centies un uztaisījis kvalitatīvu bildi, labāku par visām tavējām kopā, no vietas, kur mums vairums šejieniešu pat go-pro kameru nekad dzīvē nepielipinās un padalījies ar to tavā necilajā portālā! Novērtē to! Ko tu gribi panākt? portālu pilnu ar šitādu te drazu? aviofoto.lv/?c=bilde&id=16193&a…
Kurš kaut ko teica, ka man kaut kas ar HDR nesanāca? Viss sanāca un pat labāk, nekā plānoju (bija bildes sensenons laikos iekš shutter.lv, erfoto.lv). Vienkārši tā lieta, kā tāda - nedabīga. Skaudība? Drīzāk neizpratne, ka brāķis "aiziet" tik labi. Ja joprojām neuzskati šo par brāķi - paskaties uz to balto pāreju starp debesīm un lidmašīnu. Un vispār, ar ko es te mēģinu strīdēties - ja pats būtu fočuku kādreiz rokās paņēmis un ar HDR spēlējies - saprastu, par ko ir runa. A tagad diskutēt ar nulle bilžu autoru par to, kura ir laba un kura nav laba bilde... teikšu tā - parādi uz ko pats esi spējīgs un tad parunāsim. Turies un neapvainojies! :)
Jorsh, tu kādreiz vispār centies saprast ko citi saka? Rodas 100% iespaids, ka nē ... :(
Jā, cenšos. Vienalga vienīgais, ko no visu tekstiem sapratu - "šī ir māksla" un tjipa jāaizveras. Neviens arī necentās izlasīt un saprast, ko es te mēģinu teikt. Ieskaitot arī Tevi. Pēdējo reizi novirzīšu visu acis uz to balto malu starp debesīm un lidmašīnu. Joprojām nepielec? Joprojām šķiet, ka tā tam jābūt? Šeit ir labs piemērs, kur viss ir izdarīts pareizi un šai bilde var pateikt, ka ir šopota, bet nav pāršopota: aviofoto.lv/?c=bilde&id=5719 Viss, ievelkam visi tagad dziļu elpu, iedzeram karstvīnu un uztraucamies par kādām globālākām lietām... :) Jauku visiem 3. adventi! :)
Nu nē, šai bildei ir pārgaismoti laukumi debesīs, arī brāķis? :)
Tu, laikam, esi pavisam jocīgs palicis... Ja nepielec, tad neko. Cik reizes var skaidrot? Man, personīgi, jau apnika šī diskusija. Turpini vārīties pats ar sevi. Paņem vēl ekspertu arizah bariņā.
bernudārzs
Njaaa 100 gadus te nebiju ieskatiijies....un liekas veel tikpat arii neieskatiishos turpmaak....kautkaada kasiishanaas atkal.....
Look OK to me... (colors)
Crashed yesterday in Poland. Pilot did not survive. facebook.com/404531363070862/pos…
Bet rumāņiem MiG-21 nokrita ... reuters.com/article/us-romania-…
Autors nav norādījis, vai vēlas saņemt kritiku. Ieteicams atturēties no attēla kritizēšanas.
Ielogojieties, lai pievienotu komentāru